My editor at the Baltimore Sun tells me that the secretary,
who has been there for ages, has never in all her years in
the newspaper business, witnessed the storm that my article
last week elicited. In case you missed it, the piece was
titled “When Will World Confront the Undead of Croatia?” and
it called attention to the fact that not only has Croatia
not sufficiently acknowledged its zealous Nazi past of WW2,
but the past followed it into the 1990s — and the criminals
of that decade are widely celebrated by Croatians even today.
Apparently, this was the first piece of mainstream American
journalism that didn’t place the blame for the 1990s
Balkan wars squarely on Serb shoulders. For unlike the Serbs — who
are accustomed to being vilified in the press on a daily
basis for 15 years now — the hundreds of Croats, Croat
defenders and Serbophobes I heard from were breathless in
their fury and disbelief.
I will make an effort to post some of their letters, including
letters in support of the article. But I will start by posting
a letter, with my comments, that The Sun published on Saturday,
written by Josip Babic, press attaché for Croatia’s
embassy to the United States:
It is important to get the facts straight. Croatia has never
justified, nor does it purport to justify, the crimes of
the Nazi puppet regime that ruled parts of Croatia and Bosnia
and Herzegovina during World War II.
It is a favorite Croatian ploy to refer to the Ustasha regime
as a “puppet state” of Nazi Germany, when in
fact it was a member of the Axis powers. As one comment on
FreeRepublic.com asks, “[T]ell us how many ethnic Croats
were imprisoned by the Germans during WWII. You ever hear
of any? Can you name any? Do you have any photos of Germans
hanging Croats like there are photos of Germans hanging and
shooting Serb civilians, including women?” Croatians
were only too happy to finally get an independent state (this
is corroborated even by my detractors, whose letters I will
be quoting) and fight as a member of the Axis powers.
More from Mr. Babic:
And if the author had observed more closely and been more
judicious, she would have noted that Croatia has, over the
past 15 years of its independence, undertaken numerous initiatives
to confront and overcome the dark aspects of its past.
This has been done mainly through education programs in
schools and universities but also in public information campaigns.
Official textbooks in Croatia have always espoused Croatia’s
contributions to the anti-fascist alliance during World War
II, including those by leading Croats such as former Yugoslav
President Josip Broz Tito, while not shying away from addressing
the less comfortable details of Croatia’s past or,
more precisely, that of the non-legitimate, quisling regime
installed by the Nazis during World War II.
In other words, “We teach the children about what
the Germans made us do.”
In recognition of these long-standing efforts, Croatia was,
in November 2005, invited to become a full member of the
Task Force on International Cooperation on Holocaust Education,
Remembrance and Research.
That says very little, considering that, in an even bigger
perversion, when the National Holocaust Museum in Washington,
D.C. opened an exhibit in 1994 titled “Faces of Sorrow — Agony
in the Former Yugoslavia,” one invited guest was Croatia’s
then president Franjo Tudjman, who as late as 1996 was trying
to get Croatian Nazi soldiers reburied next to their victims;
who sought to diminish the crimes committed at the Jasenovac
camp; and who had written the none too Jewish-friendly book
Wastelands: Historical Truth. A September, 1994 AP description
of the exhibit: “Except for a handful of victims identified
as Bosnian Serbs, nearly all exhibited pictures show wounded,
emaciated or dead Moslems and Croats.” Back to the
attache’s letter:
Moreover, in stark contrast to what the author suggested
with regard to Croatia’s attitude on the former World
War II internment camp at Jasenovac, Croatia’s president,
prime minister and parliament speaker took part in the November
2006 opening of the permanent exhibition of the National
Museum and Education Center at the Jasenovac Memorial Park
to pay further tribute to its victims and foster education
on the Holocaust.
On that occasion, Croatian Prime Minister Ivo Sanader stated
that “not to forget the truth about our past and to
draw a lesson from it is the only guarantor of our peace
of mind and our peaceful future.”
Ah, thank you. Efraim Zuroff, the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s
coordinator of Nazi war crimes research, called the museum “a
big diappointment,” adding that “it lacks materials
or explanations about the development of the Ustasha ideology
before the war — hatred against Serbs and anti-Semitism,
which helped the spread of genocidal policy.” From
his recent op-ed in the JTA:
Despite the ostensible glitter of the high-power ceremony,
and the modernistic design of the museum replete with the
latest audio-visual gadgets, the new Croatian exhibition
borders on total failure from a historical and an educational
point of view. Completely absent, for example, is the general
context. There is nothing on World War II or the Holocaust
and, even worse, there is no explanation of Ustasha ideology.
Thus the museum has no answer for the most obvious and pressing
questions that every thinking visitor will ask: Why and how
did the crimes committed in this terrible place happen? Without
explaining the origins of the Ustasha’s genocidal policies,
none of the artifacts and testimonies make much sense.
Also disturbing is the absence of any identification of
the individuals responsible for the crimes described. Can
you imagine a museum on the site of a camp nicknamed the “Auschwitz
of the Balkans” without a single photograph of any
of its commandants or even a list of major perpetrators?
The issue of personal responsibility is ostensibly covered
by repeated references to “the Ustasha,” but
if not a single Ustasha personally connected to the crimes
at Jasenovac is named and not a single photograph of any
of the camp commanders is exhibited, then the image is created
as if no individual Croatians are actually guilty.
In this regard, I was amazed that none of the speakers mentioned
what is undoubtedly democratic Croatia’s greatest achievement
in facing its Ustasha past — the prosecution and conviction
of Jasenovac commander Dinko Šaki, whom it extradited
from Argentina in 1998 and who is still serving his jail
sentence in Lepoglava Prison. Could it be that the punishment
of such a criminal whose fanatic Croatian patriotism led
him to the Ustasha and his responsibility for the murder
of several thousand inmates is so unpopular, even in today’s
Croatia, that he was not mentioned in the politicians’ speeches,
nor does he appear anywhere in the historical exhibition?
Across the river in Republika Srpska, none of these failures
is surprising. The hostility toward the Croatians and the
mistrust of their handling and interpretation of the historical
events of World War II are legendary. They also partially
explain the intensity of the ethnic hostility that fueled
the Balkan wars of the ’90s, which only deepened the
scars and traumas of World War II. In that respect, the murder
in Jasenovac of approximately 10,000 Jews, according to the
new Croatian museum, or of 33,000 Jews, according to the
old Serbian memorial, was actually only a sideshow to the
mass murder of Serbs by the Ustasha.
This glitzy farce was put together in cooperation with the
National Holocaust Museum in D.C. Please note also that the
attache has just called the notorious Jasenovac death camp — by
all historical accounts the worst and most sadistic camp
of the Holocaust — an “internment camp.” Go
back and look. He really did.
Back to the letter:
It should also be noted that Croatia is the only country
in the region that has cooperated, and continues to fully
cooperate, with the International Criminal Tribunal for the
former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague.
Croatia has extradited or mediated in the extradition of
35 Croatian citizens or ethnic Croatians from Bosnia and
Herzegovina to the ICTY, and has fulfilled all other requests
(720 in all) put to it by the tribunal.
Croatia’s judiciary has also processed numerous war
crimes cases on its own, including several high-level cases
involving senior military commanders and a parliamentary
deputy, as well as cases transferred to Croatia by the ICTY.
Croatian citizens, regardless of ethnicity, are being held
accountable for war crimes and other violations of the rules
of war, much as those in any other democratic country subjected
to a protracted conflict on its territory would be.
Thanks again. Note this 2004 admonition from Human Rights
Watch:
To the authorities in Croatia:
War crimes prosecutions need to be brought without regard
to ethnicity.
Croatia should enhance efforts to investigate and prosecute
incidents in which ethnic Croats were responsible for crimes
against ethnic Serbs.
Charging standards and sentencing practice should be the
same for all defendants, regardless of their ethnic origin.
Croatian prosecutors should cease the practice of indicting
Serbs for war crimes on the basis of minor offences, where
Croats alleged to have committed the same acts are not charged.
Croatia should not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity
in hiring judges. Returnee Serbian judges should not be discriminated
against and should have an opportunity for employment in
Croatian courts.
In cases of group indictments, prosecutors for the special
war crimes chambers should specify the role of each individual
in the commission of the crime and not merely ground the
charges on, e.g., membership in a specific military unit
to which alleged perpetrators belonged.
Then there was this 2006 Amnesty report of prosecutions
in the Balkans. Zagreb, we have a problem:
CROATIA: Domestic prosecutions
Trials for war crimes and crimes against humanity continued
or started before local courts, often in absentia. In some
cases these trials did not meet internationally recognized
standards of fairness. In general, ethnic bias continued
to affect the investigation and prosecution by the Croatian
judiciary of wartime human rights violations. There continued
to be widespread impunity for crimes allegedly committed
by members of the Croatian Army and police forces.
Details are here. And just for fun, see the Amnesty reports
for 2003, 2004 and 2005.
End of Mr. Babic’s letter:
Croatia and its government recognize that it is in our best
interest, and the region’s best interest, that all
countries of Southeast Europe work toward the common goal
of membership in the European Union and NATO, and in so doing,
create a better and brighter future for all our citizens
based on our shared values and commitments. Croatia is dedicated
to building this common future.
It is wrong and misleading to focus on three or four individual
acts and use them to incriminate a country and its entire
population, as Ms. Gorin did.
Good God. Did he really say “three or four individual
acts”? A fitting press attache for Croatia indeed!
juliagorin.com
|