Historians dispute the claim by a British journalist that Nazi fanatics attending
a party near the Austro-Hungarian border in March 1945
killed 200 Hungarian Jews as an "additional entertainment" laid on by the hosts. The massacre did happen, though, and the circumstances
surrounding it remain unclear.
A row has broken out among historians about one of the most spectacular Nazi
crimes committed in Austria. On the night of March 24 to
March 25, 1945, some 200 Hungarian Jews were murdered in
the Austrian town of Rechnitz near the Austro-Hungarian
border. The bodies of the victims still haven't been found.
The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper last week published an essay by
British journalist David Litchfield in which he claims
that several guests at a party held by Countess Margit
von Batthyany, born Thyssen-Bornemisza, in Schloss Rechnitz
castle were offered the chance to murder the Jews as an "additional entertainment" laid on by local Nazi party chief Franz Podezin. The guests accepted the offer,
Litchfield wrote.
But several historians are now
disputing Litchfield's version of events. Berlin-based
anti-Semitism researcher Wolfgang Benz says Litchfield
is spreading "murmurings and hearsay."
Winfried Garscha of the respected
Documentation Centre of Austrian Resistance: "It was indisputably a mass murder but it didn't arise from a party whim. People
incapable of marching were murdered everywhere at the time."
Garscha said that according to documents from an official investigation into
the case after the war, the victims were among thousands
of Hungarian Jews who were forced to work on the "Southeast Wall" fortifications along the Austro-Hungarian border from autumn 1944 onwards.
On March 24 a train brought 600 of these forced laborers from the town of Köszeg
in neighboring Hungary to the town of Burg in the Burgenland
region of Austria. Some 30 percent of them were sick and
weak and were transported to Rechnitz where they arrived
in the early evening.
Meanwhile the countess was making
the final arrangements for her "followers' festival" which started at 9 p.m. The advancing Soviet Red Army was close to Rechnitz.
It wasn't unusual for Nazi officials to hold raucous parties
before the impending defeat.
The killing of the Hungarian Jews
in Rechnitz had already been decided before the party began,
according to the investigation by public prosecutors after
1945 which cited testimony from one of the accused men.
In addition, the driver who was
to take the victims to their execution had been ordered
for 9 p.m. At 10 p.m. other forced laborers were taken
to dig mass graves. Across the German Reich, Jewish prisoners
were being driven westwards by their captors who were fleeing
Soviet forces. Those incapable of carrying on were killed.
The killings at Rechnitz fit in with that pattern.
When the preparations for the
executions had been made, at around 11 p.m., local Nazi
party chief Podezin gathered a group of loyal Nazis who
were at the party and ordered them to drive with him to
a barn and kill the Jewish prisoners, according to the
investigators. His orders were carried out.
Litchfield's version can only be explained by speculation that those accused
of the massacre were lying when they said Podezin had ordered
them to commit the atrocity -- by way of covering up the
alleged connection to the party. Podezin disappeared in
1945 -- presumably with the help of the countess. The bodies
of the victims were apparently buried by 18 other Jewish
prisoners who were themselves murdered the following evening.
The case has been a political issue in Austria for decades because many Rechnitz
residents boycotted the investigation. One withness was
even murdered in 1946, and other witnesses died in mysterious
accidents. In the meantime a commemorative society called
Refugius has been established in Rechnitz. Its head, Paul
Gulda, suspects that Litchfield wanted to attract attention
with his sensational version of events.
spiegel.de
|