Just when it looked like the Hungarian
authorities finally got the message and arrested Laszlo Csatary,
the 97-year-old former commander of the Kassa ghetto during
1944 (who was convicted of war crimes by the Czechoslovak
court in 1948 in absentia), newspapers have reported that
the prosecution has dropped one of the charges. The charge
the prosecution has dropped related to Csatary’s alleged
involvement in the deportations of Polish Jews living in
Hungary in 1941 Kamenyec-Podolszkiji. These Jews were shot
to death in Kamenyec-Podolszkiji. This, in an of itself,
may not appear to be anything but a standard procedure even
though Efraim Zuroff, the director of the Wiesenthal Center
who had brought the case against Csatary claims that the
prosecution may not have interviewed an 84-year-old survivor
on whose testimony Zuroff mainly based this charge (http://forward.com/articles/160790/suspected-hungarian-nazi-cleared-in-some-deaths/).
Yet, I am afraid there is much more to the situation than
meets the eye.
Why has the prosecution moved to dismiss one out of the
two charges so fast? Perhaps it has to do with Prime Minster
Orban’s infamous characterization about how he conducts
negotiations with the IMF. In a speech, he stated that he
dances the peacock dance, that is, he appears to give in
when it comes to minor demands by the IMF (that he had long
ago also deemed necessary) to deceive his negotiating partners
while standing firm in opposition to the key demands. This
so-called peacock dance is supposed to make his negotiating
partners confused and pleased at the same time, allowing
for Orban to come out as the victor.
In this case, Mr. Orban was initially forced by Efraim Zuroff
with the assistance of a British newspaper into having Csatary
arrested after doing nothing for ten months. Mr. Orban, a
vociferous soccer fan who tends to see life as an extended
soccer metaphor, may have deemed that as a goal against him.
It is only natural for Mr. Orban to try to score his own
goals. Thus, Mr. Orban may have decided to make some gestures
towards those radical elements in Hungary who have expressed
strong opposition to any prosecution against old time Hungarian
Nazi collaborators by making a number of moves.
In the past few days, Hungarian media reports have discussed
the possibility that prosecutors may use a law against Zuroff
that was intended to dissuade people from making false accusations
out of malice or for any other reason. The mere talk of such
a case against Zuroff raises the specter of an international
scandal even as it gratifies the Hungarian radical camp’s
desire to see Zuroff squirm. (http://mno.hu/magyar_nemzet_belfoldi_hirei/zuroff-utan-is-nyomozhatnak-1098597)
After a very successful performance at the London Olympics
(Hungary ranked 14th in the medal count), the country’s
image at home as well as abroad has received a facelift.
Wonderful! There is much to celebrate. The incredibly hard
work of the athletes and the expert guidance of the coaches,
no doubt, made all of this possible. But such achievements
on the field of sports are easily overshadowed by domestic
economic and political developments.
Does Hungary really want to be seen as an aggressor against
a person who has devoted his life to hunting down people
responsible for the worst organized atrocity against Humanity
in human history? Can anyone picture Efraim Zuroff going
off to jail for five years in Hungary? Would Hungary actually
launch a case against the director of the Wiesenthal Center
in hopes of appeasing the increasingly vocal elements of
the far right who would clamor for it?
If that happened, it would cause a cascade of negative reactions.
A case based on the charge of “false accusation” would
open up many wounds, play into the hands of the many Holocaust
deniers not just in Hungary but all around the world, and
would shatter the illusion that Hungary under Prime Minister
Viktor Orban–who has voiced his thought that Hungary
perhaps ought to discard democracy altogether–is still
part of the ideological foundation that underpins the European
Union. Clearly, Prime Minister Orban, without whose approval
nothing substantial happens in Hungary, sees the dangers
to Hungary’s image such a move would entail. By allowing
such reports by retired judges and lawyers to circulate in
the press close to the prime minister, Viktor Orban wants
to score a few goals of his own. To the radical-Nazi-sympathizing
camp of the Jobbik Party, the message is clear: “You
see? I don’t let these Jews threaten us without appropriate
response! Let Zuroff (and his colleagues or others like him)
be aware that Hungary may prosecute him!” To Mr. Zuroff,
the message is also clear: “Be careful in what you
claim. We don’t like you. You’re a pest in our
eyes and your own fate is in our hands.” And to the
world at large, in case Csatary dies while the trial drags
on or is acquitted at the end, Orban can say, “you
see, I could have prosecuted Mr. Zuroff for filing false
charges against Csatary but decided to take the high road
and let him go.” No prosecution of a Nazi hunter and
no conviction on all charges (or any charges) of an old Nazi
collaborator.
An undecided soccer match in this case would signify a clear
victory to Mr. Orban against those who pressure him to do
anything he does not like from outside.
It is important for people who care about justice to stand
up and declare with a loud voice that we are not deceived
by Mr. Orban’s peacock dance.
We can only hope that international human rights groups
in tandem with a large number of people who care for justice
make enough noise for Mr. Orban to hear and act accordingly.
We can only hope that the Hungarian prosecutors assigned
to the Csatary case are not forced to dance Orban’s
peacock dance this time and can do their job without political
interference. drmandler.wordpress.com
|