The question of how Lithuania deals with its Holocaust past has
simmered for 18 years, ever since it gained independence.
But in the past few weeks it has become crucial, due to Lithuania’s
campaign to obtain recognition that Communism is the equivalent of
The current controversy kicked off on November 30, 2009, when Lithuanian
PM Andrius Kubilius was the guest on BBC’s Hardtalk.
Mr Kubilius had the bad luck of being interviewed by Jonathan Charles,
who in 2008 had produced an excellent radio documentary on the worldwide
hunt for Nazi war criminals and so was well aware of Lithuania’s
He challenged Mr Kubilius to explain the fact that not a single
Lithuanian Nazi war criminal had been punished since independence.
The PM’s plight on UK television may have gone unnoticed in
London, but it certainly registered in Vilnius. Thus three days later,
Justice Minister Remigijus Šimašius rushed to his defense
in an outrageous statement which received wide local coverage.
“The fact that many Jews were murdered in Lithuania does not
mean that Lithuanians are a nation of Jew-shooters.” On the
contrary — he said — unlike the US, the Soviet Union
and the UK, all of which were reluctant to admit fleeing Jewish refugees, “in
Lithuania, there was no persecution or oppression of the Jews” prior
to the Shoah.
To accuse Lithuania of antisemitism or collaboration is an insult
to the “hundreds of people of Lithuania who saved Jews”,
And besides, any assistance to the Nazis was not rendered “in
any official manner”.
It would be hard to imagine a more brazen revision of history. Thousands
of Lithuanians volunteered to help implement the Final Solution,
partially explaining why Lithuania had the highest victimology rate
in Europe (96.4 per cent).
It is the only country in which collaboration in mass murder of
Jews by shooting was so widespread that a special term, ydsaudiai
(shooters of Jews), was coined for it.
Add the absurd positive comparison to the UK, US and Russia — three
countries which defeated Nazi Germany — you have a typical
example of the distorted history of the annihilation of European
Jewry which is endemic in post-Communist Europe.
No one there would dare to deny the Shoah, but few have the courage
to admit the pernicious role of their own local collaborators.
It is these lies that help buttress the current campaign led by
the Baltic countries to achieve official recognition that the crimes
of Communism are just as bad as those of the Nazis.
Formulated in the “Prague Declaration” of June 2008,
which calls for a joint commemoration day for the victims of Communism
and Nazism (making Holocaust Remembrance Day superfluous) and for
a research institute which would study Nazism and Communism as a
common phenomenon (making institutes like Yad Vashem redundant),
the campaign is gathering steam.
It will constitute a major challenge to the status of the Holocaust
as a unique tragedy.
Under these circumstances, Israel’s invitation to Lithuanian
Foreign Minister Vygaudas Ušackas to speak at the Global Forum
on Combatting Antisemitism last month is difficult to understand.
If he were coming to Jerusalem to announce that his government was
stopping its campaign to equate Communism with Nazism and that, henceforth,
every effort would be made to present a historically accurate version
of the Shoah in Lithuania, it would have been reasonable.
Instead Mr Ušackas misrepresented the crimes committed by local
collaborators as “sending Jews to their death” — ie,
at the hands of others.
So why was he invited? In Israel, he did urge EU diplomats to “stop
talking too much about the Middle East”, and said he believes
that Israeli PM Netanyahu “wants peace and genuinely wants
a Palestinian state”.
Given Mr Ušackas’s highly questionable grasp of history,
it is doubtful whether these statements can be considered of any
Thus an important truth, revealed thanks to a well-informed BBC
presenter, was squandered in Jerusalem, to the detriment of the Holocaust’s